Bore/Catheter Size and Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (CAUTIs)

PICO question: Is there an association between inserting the smallest bore indwelling urinary catheter and a decreased CAUTI (catheter associated urinary tract infection) rate? Nurse was “looking for evidence-based practice, guideline, high level of evidence to support question.”

Here’s how to access a collection of 7 articles in PubMed.
a. Go to the Woodruff Health Sciences Center Library homepage (http://health.library.emory.edu)
b. Click on PubMed.
c. Then copy and paste the following link into your browser:
https://www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.proxy.library.emory.edu/sites/myncbi/1HMKnKhQm_d5i/collections/59174578/public/
d. The references will appear in PubMed. Click on a reference and you will see a Find it at Emory on the right side of the page which will provide links to full text within Emory University’s licensed resources. Emory Healthcare staff may send citations of needed articles they are unable to access to Ask a Librarian; a library staff person will request the article(s) from an outside library and email them to the EHC staff person upon arrival

Here’s notes about items in the collection.

Table 3 in the 2017 systematic review by Meddings et al states for catheter size, “The smallest bore catheter possible with consistent good drainage is recommended to avoid black neck and urethral mucosa trauma.” The two items it cites by Godfrey and Gould are in the PubMed collection.

Table 3 in article by Gao et al. states simply, “Choose a urethral catheter of the right size and right material, based on the patient’s age, sex, and urethral condition, among other characteristics” without any citing any evidence.

The entry for Catheter-associated Urinary Tract Infection (CAUTI) in DynaMed states, “consider using smallest bore catheter possible, with good drainage, to minimize bladder neck and urethral trauma unless not appropriate clinically” and cites and annotates the following guidelines by Gould and Lo that are in the PubMed collection.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (CDC HICPAC) recommendation grading system
• Category IA – strong recommendation supported by high- to moderate-quality evidence suggesting net clinical benefits or harms
• Category IB – strong recommendation supported by low-quality evidence suggesting net clinical benefits or harms or an accepted practice (for example, aseptic technique) supported by low- to very low-quality evidence
• Category IC – strong recommendation required by state or federal regulation
• Category II – weak recommendation supported by any quality evidence suggesting a trade-off between clinical benefits and harms
• No recommendation/unresolved issue – unresolved issue for which there is low- to very low-quality evidence with uncertain trade-offs between benefits and harms
• Reference – CDC HICPAC guideline on prevention of catheter-associated urinary tract infections

Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America/Infectious Diseases Society of America (SHEA/IDSA) quality of evidence grades
• Grade I – high-quality evidence
o highly confident that true effect lies close to that of estimated size and direction of effect
o wide range of studies with no major limitations, little variation between studies, and summary estimate has a narrow confidence interval
o true effect is likely to be close to estimated size and direction of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different
• Grade II – moderate-quality evidence
o only a few studies and some have limitations but not major flaws
o some variation between studies, or the confidence interval of the summary estimate is wide
o true effect may be substantially different from estimated size and direction of the effect
• Grade III – low-quality evidence
o when supporting studies have major flaws, important variation between studies, the confidence interval of the summary estimate is very wide
o no rigorous studies, only expert consensus
• Reference – SHEA/IDSA practice recommendations on strategies to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infections in acute care hospitals

Here are two of the search strings I used. I skimmed the most recent five years and did not include choose articles that studied only pediatric populations.

(CAUTI OR CAUTIs OR CA-UTI OR CA-UTIs OR catheter associated urinary tract infection OR catheter associated urinary tract infections OR catheter-associated urinary tract infection OR catheter-associated urinary tract infections) AND (small OR smaller OR smallest OR large OR larger OR largest OR size OR sizes OR bore OR bores OR caliber OR calibers)

(bundle OR bundles OR multipronged OR 6-c OR 6c OR toolkit OR toolkits) AND (CAUTI OR CAUTIs OR CA-UTI OR CA-UTIs OR catheter associated urinary tract infection OR catheter associated urinary tract infections OR catheter-associated urinary tract infection OR catheter-associated urinary tract infections) AND (lower OR lowers OR lowered OR lowering OR decrease OR decreases OR decreased OR decreasing OR reduce OR reduces OR reduced OR reducing OR reduction OR reductions OR improve OR improves OR improved OR improving OR improvement OR improvements OR better OR best)

**********************************

Important message for Emory Decatur Nurses. The links will not work for you. To access these articles contact the Emory Decatur Library:

Emory Decatur Hospital
Jessica Callaway (Jessica.callaway@emoryhealthcare.org)
404.501.1628

Bundles and multipronged interventions to prevent CAUTIs (last 5 years)

Here’s how to access a collection of 22 articles on bundles and multipronged interventions to prevent CAUTIs in PubMed.

a. Go to the Woodruff Health Sciences Center Library homepage (http://health.library.emory.edu)
b. Click on PubMed.
c. Then paste the three following link into your browser:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/myncbi/1HMKnKhQm_d5i/collections/58794569/public/
d. The references will appear in PubMed. Click on a reference and you will see a Find it at Emory on the right side of the page which will provide links to full text within Emory University’s licensed resources. Emory Healthcare staff may send citations of needed articles they are unable to access to Ask a Librarian; a library staff person will request the article(s) from an outside library and email them to the EHC staff person upon arrival

**********************************

Important message for Emory Decatur Nurses. The links will not work for you. To access these articles contact the Emory Decatur Library:

Emory Decatur Hospital
Jessica Callaway (Jessica.callaway@emoryhealthcare.org
404.501.1628

Prevention of central line and catheter associated bloodstream infections.

Gilbert, R., Mok, Q., Dwan, K., Harron, T., Moitt, M., Millar, P., . . . Gamble. (n.d.). Impregnated central venous catheters for prevention of bloodstream infection in children (the CATCH trial): A randomised controlled trial. The Lancet., 387(10029), 1732-1742.

Catheter impregnation, coating or bonding for reducing central venous catheter-related infections in adults. (n.d.). The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews., 3, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. , 2016, Vol.3.

Hugill, K. (n.d.). Preventing bloodstream infection in IV therapy. Br J Nurs, 26(14), S4-S10.

Nuckols, T., Keeler, E., Morton, S., Anderson, L., Doyle, B., Booth, M., . . . Shekelle, P. (2016). Economic Evaluation of Quality Improvement Interventions for Bloodstream Infections Related to Central Catheters: A Systematic Review. JAMA Internal Medicine, 176(12), 1843-1854.

Jeanes, A., & Bitmead, J. (n.d.). Reducing bloodstream infection with a chlorhexidine gel IV dressing. Br J Nurs, 24(19), S14-S19.

Marang-van de Mheen, P., & Van Bodegom-Vos, L. (n.d.). Meta-analysis of the central line bundle for preventing catheter-related infections: A case study in appraising the evidence in quality improvement. BMJ Quality & Safety., 25(2), 118-129.

Cho, Sun Young, Chung, Doo Ryeon, Ryu, Jae Geum, Choi, Jong Rim, Ahn, Nayeon, Kim, Seonwoo, . . . Song, Jae-Hoon. (n.d.). Impact of Targeted Interventions on Trends in Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infection: A Single-Center Experience From the Republic of Korea. Critical Care Medicine., 45(6), E552-E558.

Ista, E., Van der Hoven, B., Kornelisse, R., Van der Starre, C., Vos, M., Boersma, E., & Helder, O. (n.d.). Effectiveness of insertion and maintenance bundles to prevent central-line-associated bloodstream infections in critically ill patients of all ages: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet Infectious Diseases., 16(6), 724-734.

Having more than one person work together to insert an urinary catheter

Relevant systematic reviews and guidelines do not mention having more than one person insert an urinary catheter.

Following are citations and links to full text for three items in which two people worked together to insert catheters:

Galiczewski JM, Shurpin KM. An intervention to improve the catheter associated urinary tract infection rate in a medical intensive care unit: Direct observation of catheter insertion procedure. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2017 Jun;40:26-34. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2016.12.003. Epub 2017 Feb 22. Excerpt: “CAUTI rates decreased from 2.24 to 0 per 1000 catheter days.” Three comments are available on this article. To view them, go here, and then copy and paste this url into the browser so that the Find it & Emory button will be available: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/myncbi/1HMKnKhQm_d5i/collections/58794408/public/.

Fletcher-Gutowski S, Cecil J. Is 2-person urinary catheter insertion effective in reducing CAUTI? Am J Infect Control. 2019 Jul 16. pii: S0196-6553(19)30575-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2019.05.014. [Epub ahead of print]. Excerpt: “The results of this study indicate implementation of the 2-person urinary catheter insertion protocol with a checklist decreased the risk of CAUTI for our patient population.”

Breiter Y et al. 9-186 – Catheter-associated urinary tract infection reduction in the emergency department as a result of dual personnel urinary catheter insertion. American Journal of Infection Control. 2016;44:6(S88-S89). (this is only an abstract; 201 patients underwent dual personnel urinary catheter insertion; none developed a CAUTI)

Heudorf U. Grünewald M, Otto U. Implementation of the updated 2015 Commission for Hospital Hygiene and Infection Prevention (KRINKO) recommendations “Prevention and control of catheter-associated urinary tract infections” in the hospitals in Frankfurt/Main, Germany. GMS Hyg Infect Control. 2016 Jun 30;11:Doc14. doi: 10.3205/dgkh000274. eCollection 2016. Excerpt: “demonstrations were always performed by two persons (the second to hand the sterile materials to the first).”

Updated 8/23/2019 ldt

What are the most recent guidelines for preventing catheter associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI)?

The Catheter-associated urinary tract infection topic in DynaMed identifies these US guidelines:

 

What is the evidence for interventions to prevent catheter associated urinary tract infections?

Bottom line:  Best available evidence suggests that tap water can be used to effectively clean genitalia; daily cleaning of the meatal area and early removal of catheters are associated with reduction in CAUTIs.  Some evidence suggests silver-impregnated catheters associated with decreased incidence of bacteriuria.  Evidence does not support use of sealed drainage systems (as a single strategy), adding antibacterial solutions to drainage bags, or routinely changing drainage bags (as opposed to changing only when clinically necessary.)

SummaryUrethral Catheter (Indwelling Short-Term): Urinary Tract Infection Prevention.  Jahan, Nasreen.  Joanna Briggs Evidence Summaries.  AN: JBI594.  2013.

Moola S, Konno R.  A systematic review of the management of shot-term indwelling urethral catheters to prevent urinary tract infections.  JBI Library of Systematic Reviews.  2010;8(17): 695-729.

Review of studies retrieved from Medline and CINAHL and that included adult patients using urinary catheters 1 to 14 days.  Methodologies included first RCTs.  If no RCTs available, then non-randomized studies and before and after studies were included.  Results section describes findings for various types of intervention strategies.