Unknown's avatar

About Amy

Clinical Informationist at EUH Branch Library

Are physical restraints safe and effective for preventing unplanned extubation in non-ICU, vented patients?

Bottom line:  In ICU units many intubated patients who remove their own tubes do so while some type of physical restraint is in use.

A search of PubMed, CINAHL and EMBASE retrieved only studies of patients in intensive care.  No direct published evidence addresses efficacy of restraints at reducing self-extubations in patients outside of ICU units.  The following systematic review addresses association between use of restraints and self-extubation in patients on ICU units.

da Silva PS, Fonseca MC. Unplanned endotracheal extubations in the intensive care unit: systematic review, critical appraisal, and evidence-based recommendations. Anesth Analg. 2012;114(5):1003-1014.
Seventeen of the fifty studies that were included in this systematic review examined the incidence of unplanned extubation in physically restrained patients. The percentage of restrained patients under physical restraint at the time of unplanned extubations ranged from 25%” to 87%. Only one study identified the use of physical restraints as a risk factor for unplanned extubations on multivariate analysis (OR 3.1, 95% CI 1.71–5.7). The article concluded that use of physical restraints remains controversial.

Reviewed and updated 4/10/2014 ldt

 

Are there randomized controlled trials of multi-pronged interventions to reduce falls in acute care settings?

There are two randomized controlled trials on multiple interventions to prevent falls in acute care settings.

Dykes PC, et al.  Fall prevention in acute care hospitals : A randomized trial.  JAMA. 2010;304(17):1912-1918.
This study randomly assigned nursing units 1) to use an intervention including a specific risk assessment tool, care plan based on the assessment, patient and family education materials or 2) to provide usual care (control). Baseline characteristics of units were similar. Table 3 (p. 1916) summarizes differences in fall rates (per 1,000 patient days) for all patients as well as specifically for patients aged 65+. Significant differences favored the units using the intervention.

Ang E, Mordiffi SZ, Wong HB. Evaluating the use of a targeted multiple intervention strategy in reducing patient falls in an acute care hospital: a randomized controlled trial. J Adv Nurs. 2011;67(9):1984-1992.
There were 912 and 910 participants in the control and intervention groups, respectively. Intervention group patients received usual care and targeted multiple interventions based on individual risk factors of the Hendrich II Falls Risk Model; unfortunately, the article does not provide examples of interventional techniques. The fall incidence rates were 1·5% (95% CI: 0·9-2·6) and 0·4% (95% CI: 0·2-1·1) in the control and intervention groups, respectively. The relative risk estimate of 0·29 (95% CI: 0·1-0·87) favors the intervention group.

Reviewed and updated 4/10/2014 ldt

What are the most common factors associated with accidental falls in acute care facilities?

All four systematic reviews determined that impaired mental status and a history of falls are common factors associated with accidental falls in acute settings. See below for other risk factors.

Summary:

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Jan;95(1):50-57.
After conducting a systematic review of the literature to identify risk factors, researchers linked the 88 factors to 66 International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) categories and 5 personal factors (see Appendix 1). Twenty multidisciplinary participants from different institutions completed three rounds of rating the importance of each category and factor regarding falls in acute rehabilitation settings using a 5-point Likert scale.
RESULTS: Thirty-four ICF categories and two personal factors achived threshold values of importance, and their scores are listed in Table 1. Of these, items scored 4.9 or 5.0 include four body functions (consciousness fuctions (i.e. confusion/disorientation), sensations association with hearing and vestibular function (i.e. dizziness/vertigo), muscle power functions (i.e. motor status related to stroke), and gait pattern functions (i.e. gait stability)), one activity (walking), and one personal factor (previous falls).

Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2013 May-Jun;56(3):407-415.
Systematic review with ten studies that met the inclusion criteria for studies on older hospital patients. When there were at least 3 studies investigating a factor in a comparable way in a specific setting, researchers computed the pooled odds ratio (OR) using random effect models.
RESULTS: Six risk factors for older hospital inpatients (HI) were considered, and the strongest association was a history of falls (OR=2.85). Other risk factors that were significantly associated with falls were cognitive impairment (OR = 1.52 overall, OR = 1.65 multivariate), use of sedatives (OR = 1.89 overall and multivariate), and use of antidepressants (OR = 1.98 overall and multivariate).

Age Ageing. 2004 Mar;33(2):122-30.
This is a systematic review of thirteen studies that described risk factors in a variety of inpatient settings.
RESULTS: A small number of factors were repeatedly found to be significant: gait instability, lower limb weakness, previous fall history, medications, toileting factors (urinary incontinence/frequency or need for assistance), and agitation/confusion or impaired judgement. See Table 3 for odds ratios and confidence intervals for all risk factors.

Int J Nurs Pract. 2001 Feb;7(1):38-45
This is a systematic review of 13 case-control and 5 cohort studies of patient falls in hospitals.
RESULTS: Factors associated with increased risk of falling included special toileting needs (incontinence, needing assistance, having diarrhea), impaired mobility or use of mobility aid, impaired mental status, and history of falling. Doesn’t provide any numerical risk data.

Reviewed and updated 4/10/2014 ldt

Communicating about evidence-based practice in patient care

Welcome. This blog facilitates communication on issues of evidence-based practice by Emory Healthcare Nursing Quality Initiatives teams. Questions posed by the teams and information to address those questions will be documented in these posts.