Does double checking by two registered nurses prior to injection of insulin or heparin reduce risk of medication errors?

Bottom line:  There is little evidence to support or to refute the effectiveness of double-checking by nurses to reduce rates of medication errors.

Wimpenny P and Kirkpatrick P.  Roles and systems for routine medication administration to prevent medication errors in hospital-based, acute care settings: a systematic review.  JBI Library of Systematic Reviews. 2010;8(10):405-446.

Hughes RG and Blegen MA.  Medication administration safety.  In:  Patient Safety and Quality:  An Evidence-Based Handbook for Nurses.  AHRQ.  Updated April 2008.  http://www.ahrq.gov/qual/nurseshdbk/docs/HughesR_MAS.pdf
Start with the Policies, Procedures and Protocols section on p. 20.

O’Connell B et al.  Nurses’ attitudes to single checking medications:  before and after its use.  Inter J Nurs Practice.  2007; 13: 377-82.

Studies of errors reported by nurses that address double-checking:

Jarman et al.  Inter J Nurs Practice. 2002; 8: 330-335.  Survey of nurses reporting errors during period of single-checking and period of double-checking.  No significant difference in error rates between the two periods.

Stratton KM et al.  J Pediatr Nurs.  2004;19(6): 385.  Survey of nurses’ perceptions of factors associated with medication errors.  For 28% of the errors reported, nurses identified failure to double-check as a reason for the error.

Reviewed 4/14/2014 AA

Does uterine fibroid size or patient weight affect outcome of uterine artery embolization?

Review evidence summary of Uterine Fibroids in JBI.

Follow up studies addressing risk factors, such as fibroid size, for treatment failure or complications.  Pertinent studies include:

Parthipun AA, et al.   Does size really matter?  Analysis of the effect of large fibroids and uterine volumes on complication rates of uterine artery embolisation. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2010Oct;33(5):955-9. Epub 2010 May 5. PubMed PMID: 20442999.

Smeets AJ, Nijenhuis RJ, van Rooij WJ, Weimar EA, Boekkooi PF, Lampmann LE,
Vervest HA, Lohle PN. Uterine artery embolization in patients with a large
fibroid burden: long-term clinical and MR follow-up. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol.
2010 Oct;33(5):943-8. Epub 2010 Jan 12. PubMed PMID: 20066419

Hirst A, et al.  A multi-centre retrospective cohort study comparing the
efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of hysterectomy and uterine artery
embolisation for the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids. The HOPEFUL
study. Health Technol Assess. 2008 Mar;12(5):1-248, iii. PubMed PMID: 18331704.

Arleo EK, Masheb RM, Pollak J, McCarthy S, Tal MG. Fibroid volume, location
and symptoms in women undergoing uterine artery embolization: does size or
position matter? Int J Fertil Womens Med. 2007 Mar-Jun;52(2-3):111-20. PubMed
PMID: 18320870.
In print at the WHSC Library

Firouznia K, Ghanaati H, Sanaati M, Jalali AH, Shakiba M. Uterine artery
embolization in 101 cases of uterine fibroids: do size, location, and number of
fibroids affect therapeutic success and complications? Cardiovasc Intervent
Radiol. 2008 May-Jun;31(3):521-6. Epub 2008 Jan 25. PubMed PMID: 18219521.

Siskin GP, et al.  UAE versus Myomectomy Study Group. A
prospective multicenter comparative study between myomectomy and uterine artery
embolization with polyvinyl alcohol microspheres: long-term clinical outcomes in
patients with symptomatic uterine fibroids. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2006
Aug;17(8):1287-95. PubMed PMID: 16923975.

Reviewed 4/18/14  AA